🔗 Share this article

Itranspired he endured a loss to Grimsby. Survive losing a crucial continental showpiece against a particularly poor Spurs sides for many years. He could survive losing at home against West Ham and Wolves, a lowly league position, an unwavering system, laying waste to some of the club’s best homegrown talent, the 32% win rate, calling the squad the worst in Manchester United history. Yet, there existed a single opponent with whom Ruben Amorim would not be allowed to engage. You come at Jason Wilcox, you had better succeed.

Unfortunately, similar to numerous Premiership right-back during Blackburn Rovers' title-winning campaign, the coach took on the executive and seems to have failed. The most distracted of readers will notice the irony here: a manager who often railed his squad for failing in one-on-one duels succumbing when confronted by the white heat and formidable presence of one of England's top division's most feared football executives.

And frankly, this entire painful saga appears to portray the director in a different perspective. It may have been tempting, given his nine months in a similar role at Southampton, to regard Jason Wilcox as merely a functionary in the United exoskeleton: a man who owed his position as much to his close relationship with his former boss a fellow executive rather than any demonstrable skill. How mistaken we all were. In brilliantly outmanoeuvring United’s feted manager, just as he bested the unfortunate Dan Ashworth before him, he has demonstrated to be among football's true generals: a strategic mind that United’s competitors are now rightly wary.

A Strategic Clash Over Formation and Ideology

To illustrate, this was Jason Wilcox who being involved in the leadership that appointed the 3-4-3 fundamentalist the coach in the first place, was instrumental in trying to persuade him to abandon his favored formation. Naturally, these pleas faced pushback. However, such directives hold greater authority when delivered from the mouth of a man the impeccable football pedigree he possesses, a veteran of three England caps and a contributor to a championship team decades past.

Maybe eventually Jason Wilcox may be persuaded to explain his thought processes to the rest of us. Maybe one day questions may arise regarding why the coach is departing with a full payout, with no compensation reduction clause activated. The director speaks rarely publicly, for excellent reasons. The true intellectuals in football – men like him – function on a plane beyond our own mundane comprehension. If he ever did speak, probably we would perceive would be ultrasonic blips and complex calculations. Desiring an explanation is not quite the same as being ready to comprehend it.

An Supreme Authority Behind the Throne

But of course, in training our focus on the sporting director we are obscuring the real power behind the club's current leadership. The director is, after all, simply carrying out the commands of his ultimate line manager Sir Jim Ratcliffe, who in private has made very clear his preference for a four-man defense. According to reports, the owner has also proposed playing Bryan Mbeumo in a wing-back role. The owner is eager for United to adopt analytics and analytics. Per reports, in an executive meeting soon after his investment, he declared that the team's approach of play “shall be decided by this group”.

After all, Ratcliffe is a specialist in these intricate footballing stuff, leveraging his background in industry and yachting. Most importantly he is incredibly rich, and it is known, the rich are superior: more insightful, sagacious, strategically brilliant, simply better. Who else would you trust to manage an enlightened programme of austerity, the building of a modern arena that looks a lot like an abstract design, the acquisition of Benjamin Sesko?

The New Football Order: Executives Above Managers

This represents a shift that is becoming prevalent in top-tier of the game. For decades, teams mistakenly delegated major sporting choices to low-level employees such as coaches, scouts – even footballers. Perhaps it was once possible for a young, innovative manager with a philosophy and energy to join a club and see their vision through to completion. But how many businesses have such individuals set up? How many mass redundancies have they overseen? Far preferable to place the real power where it rightly belongs: the executive class, the casually dressed executives, the individuals with impressive LinkedIn profiles. It is wiser to determine the strategy by the directors and appoint a coach who will adapt their methods to suit. If managers were once chefs, they are now more akin to Deliveroo drivers: not really responsible for the product, yet finally accountable should it be delivered cold or fails to meet standards.

In the meantime, a coach's role has become not about defining the vision and more about marketing it: the front-facing representative of the operation, the visible figurehead of an organisation they can do little to influence. Enzo Maresca leads a team of very young players into Europe and secures domestic cups, and essentially gets sacked for speaking out. Wilfried Nancy finds his reputation ruined while those individuals who hired him continue to make errors another day.

A Modern Corporate Football: Accountability for the Few

And possibly on some microcosmic level this is simply corporate governance in action: the rise of a privileged elite who are infallible, whose choices remain sacrosanct, whose errors can invariably be sacked away without justification. Hire the 3-4-3 coach and then fire them for using excessively that system. Bring in the project manager and then bin him for requiring excessive time. And above all show gratitude; for the incremental season ticket price rises, for your new summer signings, for the reality that the grownups – regardless of their expertise – are in charge.