🔗 Share this article

Iran is ready to resume nuclear negotiations with Washington as long as it is treated with "respect" and "honor", Iran's foreign minister has stated.

The Iranian diplomat said solely negotiations produced results, and revealed fresh requests had been made by intermediaries to resume discussions with the Trump administration. He asserted Iran did not have unreported enrichment locations, and Tehran could not yet permit the global atomic watchdog to inspect attacked atomic facilities for security reasons.

Navigating a Difficult Route

The foreign minister is treading a challenging path since Iran aims to avoid be seen to be operating from a stance of disadvantage, and he consistently maintained that Iran had emerged more powerful militarily and psychologically from the Israeli-US attack on its atomic facilities in June.

He was speaking at a defense forum in Tehran where he restated that Iran had "a fundamental entitlement to refine atomic fuel domestically that it will perpetually retain" – the main reason of the impasse in the previous talks.

Previous Discussions Abruptly Terminated

The earlier sessions of talks between the US and Iran were concluded unexpectedly and hostile end on 12 June when the Israeli government, with American backing, attacked Iran's enrichment centers in a fortnight-long engagement that ended with Donald Trump declaring the locations had been obliterated. Following this, Western states employed their right to reimpose international penalties, but Iran asserts they have not had a major impact.

Ideal Resolution Offered

Tehran representatives said they felt they had achieved a "ideal resolution" to the nuclear fuel concern in prior discussions, when it was agreed an local partnership with American involvement could refine atomic fuel. Each party would have been able to declare success since home-based processing would have continued and the US could be assured that Iran's atomic project was solely for peaceful purposes.

It had not been decided in the talks that American atomic experts could work on Iranian soil, but that was a natural consequence of the consortium proposal. Representatives claimed on multiple occasions they had achieved a deal with the US representative the American negotiator only for the arrangement to fall apart due to "spoilers in Washington".

Current Status

Iran's diplomats declared the cooperative arrangement was now withdrawn, but it seems quite possible the suggestion could be resurrected in various formats if negotiations resume.

The US president last week stated he had been receiving messages that Iran wanted to reopen negotiations, but privately Iranian officials state they are not yet obtaining consistent overtures from America either explicitly or from significant local go-betweens, such as Qatar, Egypt, Oman and the Saudi kingdom. The Iranian foreign ministry has been criticized of passivity in the face of Washington's unmediated tactics, but Iran asserts diplomacy is not part of a spectacle.

Diplomatic Position

In his remarks to the forum, intended to depict the US as a controlling nation that misuses the notion of worldwide standards, Araghchi stated the 12-day war demonstrated the clash could not be ended by combat operations. He stated the strikes commenced with a US demand for an total Iran submission and ended with an unconditional call for a ceasefire.

Iran is convinced the first strikes by Israel were carried out with full US knowledge and collaboration, making confidence challenging to reestablish.

Negotiations Stays the Primary Answer

The foreign minister said: "Tehran was not the one that had abandoned dialogue; it was the United States and the western countries that had consistently attempted to enforce their desires during the negotiations. Dialogue can still be viable and remains the primary solution to address disagreements, but its criteria, guidelines and tenets must be followed."

"Provided that they address to the Iranian people with the tone of dignity and honor, they will get a response in the equivalent approach."

Recovery and Recovery

In what is described by Tehran representatives as the conflict of restoration and rebuilding, the foreign minister said he was confident Iran's security strengths "are considerably enhanced than prior to 13 or 14 June of this year. All our capabilities have been restored. We learned multiple understandings from this war; we have come to know our own weaknesses and the vulnerabilities of the enemy."

He continued: "We effectively endured this engagement. Our enrichment knowledge, which they planned to eliminate, remains in place. The facilities and machinery, if damaged, will be restored; what is important is the determination of the citizens of Tehran and then the social solidarity that they aimed at, but were unable to shatter. The citizens of Tehran have become more powerful, more united, and more backing of the leadership and the state in the wake of this invasion."